Friday, March 28, 2014

The EITC Cannot Fight Poverty Alone



The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is a powerful tool for helping low-income working families, but to effectively raise Marylanders out of poverty and foster broad-based prosperity, it must work alongside other measures, including a boost in the minimum wage.

Recently, some policymakers in Maryland have portrayed  the EITC as some kind of super-policy that can fight poverty on its own, but  this is not the case.

The EITC – a federal tax credit that Maryland supplements with a state EITC -- makes low-wage work more viable for families by offsetting some of the taxes they pay and boosting their income. However, as the non-partisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out this week, there are some things that the EITC cannot do, like helping people who are out of work or unable to work, or helping the poorest families that do not make enough to qualify for the credit.

In addition, because families reap the benefits of the EITC once a year when they file their taxes, it does not help them when they may need a boost the most, like when the monthly rent is due or they need to repair the car they use to get to work. More broadly, because the EITC is based on wages, it does not automatically expand to stabilize the economy during recessions, the way that other services, like nutrition assistance, do.

The EITC also does not provide workers with health insurance.

Because of these limitations, we need other policies to complement the EITC, including nutrition assistance, access to health insurance through programs such as Medicaid, and unemployment insurance to see individual workers through job losses and help the economy as a whole through downturns. And, of course, a robust minimum wage that keeps up with the cost of living and allows workers to support themselves and their families.

Maryland policymakers need to recognize the importance of making these programs and policies work together on behalf of working families. For instance, as they consider legislation that would make the state’s EITC more generous, state lawmakers also should finish the task of raising the minimum wage. That would build on the strides Maryland has made recently in improving access to health care by expanding Medicaid and working to implement the Affordable Care Act.

It’s fortunate that so many policymakers agree the EITC is an important and effective way to provide economic assistance to working families in Maryland. The current proposal to expand the state EITC enjoys bipartisan support in the General Assembly, and the EITC has also won praise from conservative lawmakers such as U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan. Unfortunately, some of this acclaim portrays the EITC as an alternative to other policies such as raising the minimum wage, rather than as a supplement to those things.

The EITC is an important policy, but we should not rely on it to do everything. There is no silver bullet capable of singlehandedly ending poverty. Instead we need lots of programs and ideas to peck away at it from every angle.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Budget Negotiators Should Restore Funds for Vital Services and Programs for Working Families

As Maryland lawmakers start working out differences between the Senate and House budget plans, they should take advantage of numerous options to fully restore unwise and unnecessary cuts to needed programs and services for working families.

Both plans rely on spending cuts first proposed in the Governor’s budget and add additional cuts as well. They would cut $400 million over the next two years from planned reinvestment payments to the state’s pension system, double what the Governor proposed cutting. The state Comptroller and Treasurer both advise against these cuts.  Both chambers’ budgets also shift funding for Land Preservation/Open Space programs and the Bays Trust Fund and use the money to balance the budget.


Source: Senate Budget & Tax and House Appropriations Committees (click to enlarge)

The House budget does restore funding to some programs cut in the Senate’s version, but some of its other provisions would hurt working families. The House budget restores $900,000 for the Employment Advancement Right Now (EARN) job training program; $1 million for child care subsidies; and $2 million for the Early College Innovation Fund, which provides seed funding to school systems to start early college access programs. At the same time, the House budget cuts $1.7 million in K-12 education aid added by the Senate.  

Though the House cuts higher education slightly less than the Senate, it would still provide $11.2 million less to colleges and universities than Governor O’Malley’s plan.  Reduced state support for higher education can lead to higher tuition for students and families.

The House budget also cuts state Medicaid funds by an additional $2.4 million, bringing them to $20.7 million. Since state Medicaid dollars are matched by federal funds, the total Medicaid reduction would be $41.4 million. Cuts to Medicaid providers can make it difficult for patients to get the care they need.

The House cut foster care funds by an additional $2 million, bringing the total cut to $5 million. It cut the same amount as the Senate, $3.8 million, from the Temporary Disability Assistance Program, which helps disabled, low-income adults while they are awaiting eligibility determination for federal disability support. 





Source: House Appropriations Committee (click to enlarge)

The lawmakers who will work out the differences between the House and Senate plans in a conference committee can fully restore funding for education, health and human services to the levels proposed by the Governor.  The committee should adopt the House plan to restore funds for the Early College Innovation Fund, child care subsidies, and EARN, and should adopt the Senate’s $1.7 million increase to K-12 education. 

Instead of reducing foster care and TDAP funds, the committee should fully restore the funding to the level proposed by the Governor.  If those funds are not needed due to lower caseloads, the foster care funds can be used to provide in-home family services.  Or any extra TDAP or foster care funds could be shifted out of the budget with a deficiency reversion, a tool that transfers funds out of over-funded budget items and adds the money to the General Fund's closing balance, which provides added flexibility in the next budget.

Similarly, the conference committee should undo the $20.7 million in Medicaid cuts to protect access to care and avert an accompanying reduction in federal funds.  By restoring $11.2 million in higher education funds, the legislature could protect students and families from increases in tuition and student loans. 

The legislature could pay for restoring these funds by adopting the Senate version of cuts to personnel and administrative expenses, debt service/reserves and economic development programs, along with the House’s $2 million cut to the Biotechnology Tax Credit. To supplement these reductions, the legislature could use $11.5 million of the $87 million closing cash balance in the House plan and fully restore funding for education, health and human services programs, while still closing out the upcoming FY 2015 budget with more than $75 million in cash balance.    



Source: Senate Budget & Tax and House Appropriations Committees 

Check back here for more information on budget actions by the legislature and their impact on valuable and proven services and programs.