Showing posts with label budget process. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget process. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Budget Negotiators Should Restore Funds for Vital Services and Programs for Working Families

As Maryland lawmakers start working out differences between the Senate and House budget plans, they should take advantage of numerous options to fully restore unwise and unnecessary cuts to needed programs and services for working families.

Both plans rely on spending cuts first proposed in the Governor’s budget and add additional cuts as well. They would cut $400 million over the next two years from planned reinvestment payments to the state’s pension system, double what the Governor proposed cutting. The state Comptroller and Treasurer both advise against these cuts.  Both chambers’ budgets also shift funding for Land Preservation/Open Space programs and the Bays Trust Fund and use the money to balance the budget.


Source: Senate Budget & Tax and House Appropriations Committees (click to enlarge)

The House budget does restore funding to some programs cut in the Senate’s version, but some of its other provisions would hurt working families. The House budget restores $900,000 for the Employment Advancement Right Now (EARN) job training program; $1 million for child care subsidies; and $2 million for the Early College Innovation Fund, which provides seed funding to school systems to start early college access programs. At the same time, the House budget cuts $1.7 million in K-12 education aid added by the Senate.  

Though the House cuts higher education slightly less than the Senate, it would still provide $11.2 million less to colleges and universities than Governor O’Malley’s plan.  Reduced state support for higher education can lead to higher tuition for students and families.

The House budget also cuts state Medicaid funds by an additional $2.4 million, bringing them to $20.7 million. Since state Medicaid dollars are matched by federal funds, the total Medicaid reduction would be $41.4 million. Cuts to Medicaid providers can make it difficult for patients to get the care they need.

The House cut foster care funds by an additional $2 million, bringing the total cut to $5 million. It cut the same amount as the Senate, $3.8 million, from the Temporary Disability Assistance Program, which helps disabled, low-income adults while they are awaiting eligibility determination for federal disability support. 





Source: House Appropriations Committee (click to enlarge)

The lawmakers who will work out the differences between the House and Senate plans in a conference committee can fully restore funding for education, health and human services to the levels proposed by the Governor.  The committee should adopt the House plan to restore funds for the Early College Innovation Fund, child care subsidies, and EARN, and should adopt the Senate’s $1.7 million increase to K-12 education. 

Instead of reducing foster care and TDAP funds, the committee should fully restore the funding to the level proposed by the Governor.  If those funds are not needed due to lower caseloads, the foster care funds can be used to provide in-home family services.  Or any extra TDAP or foster care funds could be shifted out of the budget with a deficiency reversion, a tool that transfers funds out of over-funded budget items and adds the money to the General Fund's closing balance, which provides added flexibility in the next budget.

Similarly, the conference committee should undo the $20.7 million in Medicaid cuts to protect access to care and avert an accompanying reduction in federal funds.  By restoring $11.2 million in higher education funds, the legislature could protect students and families from increases in tuition and student loans. 

The legislature could pay for restoring these funds by adopting the Senate version of cuts to personnel and administrative expenses, debt service/reserves and economic development programs, along with the House’s $2 million cut to the Biotechnology Tax Credit. To supplement these reductions, the legislature could use $11.5 million of the $87 million closing cash balance in the House plan and fully restore funding for education, health and human services programs, while still closing out the upcoming FY 2015 budget with more than $75 million in cash balance.    



Source: Senate Budget & Tax and House Appropriations Committees 

Check back here for more information on budget actions by the legislature and their impact on valuable and proven services and programs. 

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Choices and Challenges: Maryland's Budget Outlook & Governor's Upcoming FY 2015 Budget - Part III

By David McNear

Previously, we have provided a general overview of the state budget process as well as a more detailed discussion of the sources of the deficiencies that state lawmakers must address in the current session. We will conclude with an overview of Maryland’s capital budget as well as provide more detail on the operating budget

Capital Budget Overview

 Maryland's Capital Budget funds the state's Capital Improvement Plan.  In FY 2014, GO Bonds made up $1.1 billion, or 71% of the total $1.5 billion Capital Budget.  Capital projects for Agriculture, Environment and Natural Resources accounted for $486 million, or 31%, with Education/School Construction at $348 million, or 22%, and Higher Education projects at $352 million, or 23%. 

(Click to enlarge)

The Capital Debt Affordability Committee recommended $1.16 billion in GO Bonds for the upcoming Capital Budget.  Due to prior authorizations, including the public school construction set-aside, only $320.4 million is projected as "unspoken for" by DLS, or about 28% of recommended GO Bonds. 

(Click to enlarge)


Operating Budget Detail

General Fund Revenue is expected to grow from $14.6 billion in fiscal 2013, to $15.2 million in FY 2014 and just over $16 billion in FY 2015.

(Click to enlarge)

Maryland's expanded gaming program has increased receipts for the Education Trust Fund (ETF) and provided General Fund budget relief. The BRE projects $344 million in gaming revenue for the ETF in FY 2014 and $417 million in FY 2015.

(Click to enlarge)

General Fund spending growth in Local Aid is relatively flat, due to changes in local portion of teacher retirement costs and low inflationary data used in K-12 funding formulas.  Entitlement spending is expected to increase, mostly due to increased Medicaid spending. 

(Click to enlarge)

The $6.6 billion in FY 2014 General Fund Spending on State Agencies in FY 2014 is projected to increase to $6.9 billion in FY 2015 budget.  Fiscal 2014 state agency spending includes DLS-projected deficiencies. 

(Click to enlarge)

There is $6.3 billion in General Fund State Aid to Local Governments for both the FY 2014 and the FY 2015 budgets, with 91% going to Education and Libraries. 

(Click to enlarge)

In addition, there is $2.9 billion in General Fund FY 2014 & FY 2015 Entitlement Spending, with $2.5 billion for Medicaid.  Again, Fiscal 2014 entitlement spending includes DLS-projected deficiencies. 

(Click to enlarge)

In the previous three posts, we’ve provided a lot of detail on the context that state lawmakers face as they work to craft Maryland’s budget. Check back here for more on specific issues that affect all Marylanders as we move through the legislative session. Later this week, we will provide an instant analysis of Governor O’Malley’s budget, which he must submit by Wednesday, January 15.