Last week, the Maryland General Assembly’s Spending Affordability Committee issued its final report. The committee’s major function is to issue a recommendation for how much the budget for the coming year should be allowed to increase. The recommendation is not binding – either on the governor or the legislature.
However, the legislature generally uses the spending affordability recommendation as a policy target. If the governor’s proposed budget exceeds the recommendation, the legislature will usually cut it back.
This year, the committee’s major recommendation is that the 2013 budget should “reduce the estimated structural deficit for that year by at least 50%.”
The “structural deficit” is a measure of the state’s fiscal sustainability. Every year the state is required to balance its budget. During the recession and its aftermath, it has done so by depending on temporary measures to stay in the black, such as drawing down funds that have built up in the state’s accounts. This can get us through a rough year or two or four, but it means we always have a new budget problem the next year.
The committee estimates the structural deficit at $1.1 billion, so the recommendation requires $550 million in ongoing budget balancing actions –revenue increases or more budget cuts. By cutting the structural deficit in half, the committee aims to restore the state’s financial health without abrupt disruptions to education, health care, and other state-funded functions.The recommendation is sensible and responsible and the governor should seek to meet it.
However, in doing so, the Governor should use a balanced approach. Maryland has already cut $2 billion from annual spending for education, health care, transportation, public safety, and other important services since 2007.
Source: Spending Affordability Committee, October 2011 |
Further cuts are going to throw more Marylanders out of work; damage the services we need now from our state counties and schools; and withdraw the investments we need to secure Maryland’s prosperous future. It’s time to turn to some reasonable and fair revenue options.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.